Aliso
Creek - Watershed Management Plan
Chapter IV
|
|
|
Bridge over looking
Aliso Creek
|
CHAPTER
IV: IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING OF THE PLAN IV-1
4.1 Implementation IV-1
4.1.1 Land Use Planning Process
IV-1
4.1.2 Subwatershed Plans IV-1
4.1.3 Policies and Programs
IV-1
4.1.4 Land Stewardship IV-1
4.2 Monitoring IV-2
Chapter IV: Implementation
and Monitoring of the Plan
4.1 Implementation
The goals, objectives, and recommendations
of the Aliso Creek Watershed Management Plan (WMP) can be implemented
through a wide variety of methods. For each watershed resource
issue discussed in the WMP, the means to resolve such issues are
provided as recommended management actions.
Table 3 provides a summary of the
key recommended actions and indicates stakeholder responsibility
for implementing these actions. In general, the implementation
of this WMP can occur through land use planning documents, subwatershed
plans, local agency policy and programs, and land stewardship
initiatives. It is important to note that all watershed stakeholders
have an important role in the implementation of this WMP. With
cooperation from all stakeholders, the Aliso Creek watershed resources
can be managed more effectively and consistently.
4.1.1 Land Use Planning
Process
In order for a watershed plan to achieve
success, it is essential to incorporate the plan's goals and objectives
into municipal land use planning documents. To ensure that land
use planning occurs in an environmentally responsible manner,
it is important that official plans promote and implement the
objectives of this WMP. It is recommended that official plans
identify implementation mechanisms (i.e., subwatershed plans and
stormwater management plans) to ensure the linkage between watershed
planning and land use planning is established. Specific details
from this WMP could be implemented through comprehensive and site-specific
zoning bylaws, site plan and subdivision agreements, and a purposed
development permit process.
4.1.2 Subwatershed
Plans
Subwatershed plans are an important
mechanism for implementing watershed plans. A subwatershed plan
will concentrate on resource features identified in watershed
plans, undertake a more detailed study to identify the details
of the natural systems, and further identify areas for preservation,
conservation, enhancement, rehabilitation, and development. Subwatershed
plans can also provide more detailed goals, objectives, and recommendations
for issues of concern identified in the watershed plan and can
be implemented by smaller jurisdictions.
It is not the intent
of this WMP to delay development pending the implementation of
subwatershed studies. Rather, the undertaking of subwatershed
plans is a voluntary process that municipalities may undertake.
4.1.3 Policies and
Programs
Policies and programs
conducted by local agencies are other mechanisms that can implement
the WMP. If a local government agency identifies an area of concern
with regard to water resources, the ideologies and objectives
in the WMP can be used to support the proposed policy and ensure
its compatibility with other watershed policies and programs.
4.1.4 Land Stewardship
Another method for
implementing the Aliso Creek WMP is through land stewardship initiatives.
For example, a landowner resource center could provide watershed
residents with a common place to obtain resource management information
and advice. Furthermore, the center could provide services such
as tree planting, or bioengineering expertise needed to enhance,
restore, or rehabilitate natural resources in the Aliso Creek
watershed.
4.2 Monitoring
Monitoring the success
of this WMP and the achievement of its goals and objectives will
occur in the following manner:
- It is intended that the WMP shall
be subject to continuing review by the Aliso Creek Study Management
Team members. Whenever it is deemed necessary, due to changing
environmental, economic, technical, or social trends in the
Aliso Creek watershed, the WMP will be amended. Significant
amendments will involve a public participation process.
- It is recommended that the County
of Orange, the lead local agency, hold a yearly meeting for
presenting data collected that year and determining the need
for revisions to the WMP.
- In reviewing this WMP, appropriate
documents will be forwarded to municipalities and Study Management
Team members for input and review. It is also recommended that
a notice be given in local newspapers to provide any concerned
stakeholders with an opportunity to obtain a copy of relevant
information for input and review.
Monitoring the performance
and success of the management actions used to achieve the objectives
will occur in the following manner:
- Water quality sampling data will
be used as an indicator of water quality. This data will indicate
whether the recommendations provided in the WMP have maintained
and/or improved water quality in the Aliso Creek watershed.
- A "Watershed Report Card,"
a user-friendly method for assessing watershed health, could
be used to determine the health of the Aliso Creek watershed
each year, identify areas of concern, and reassess what can
be done to improve the overall quality of resources in the watershed.
- A questionnaire circulated to
municipalities, Study Management Team members, and other stakeholders
two years following the adoption of the WMP to determine if
the WMP is useful, implementable, and generally
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
LEGEND:
Stakeholder Role:
L -
Lead, D -
Direct, A
- Advisory,
Not Applicable
|
 |
Priority:
h - High, m
- Medium, l
- Low |
 |
Funding Requirements:
$ - Funding in moderate
amounts required (<$100,000)
$$ - Funding required (>$100,000, <$1,000,000)
$$$ - Funding required in significant amounts
(>$1,000,000,)
V - Variable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1. Aliso Creek Mainstem Ecosystem
Restoration |
L
|
D
|
A
|
A
|
D
|
D
|
|
|
|
|
h
|
$$$
|
| 2. Sulphur Creek Ecosystem Restoration |
L
|
D
|
A
|
A
|
A
|
L
|
|
|
|
|
m
|
$$$
|
| 3. Wood Canyon Ecosystem Restoration |
L
|
L
|
A
|
A
|
D
|
D
|
|
|
|
|
m
|
$$
|
| 4. English Canyon Ecosystem Restoration |
L
|
D
|
A
|
A
|
D
|
D
|
|
|
|
|
m
|
$$
|
| 5. Pacific Park Basin Ecosystem
Restoration |
L
|
D
|
A
|
A
|
D
|
D
|
|
|
|
|
m
|
$$
|
| 6. Expansion of Program, Monitoring,
and Evaluation of BMPs |
|
L
|
A
|
A
|
L
|
D
|
|
A
|
A
|
|
h
|
V
|
| 7. Small Wetlands for Water Quality |
L
|
L
|
A
|
A
|
D
|
D
|
|
|
|
|
m
|
$$$
|
| 8. Bank Stabilization Study -
SOCWA Treatment Plant |
L
|
A
|
A
|
|
|
D
|
|
|
|
|
h
|
$
|
| 9. English Canyon Erosion Control |
L
|
D
|
A
|
A
|
D
|
D
|
|
|
|
|
h
|
$$
|
| 10. Floodproofing at Aliso Creek
Inn |
A
|
D
|
|
L
|
D
|
|
|
|
|
|
l
|
$$$
|
| 11. Watershed Education |
|
L
|
|
|
L
|
D
|
D
|
D
|
D
|
D
|
h
|
V
|
| 12. Water Quality Monitoring
Plan |
|
L
|
|
|
L
|
D
|
D
|
D
|
D
|
D
|
h
|
V
|
| 13. Watershed-Wide Exotic Species
Eradication |
|
L
|
A
|
A
|
L
|
D
|
D
|
D
|
D
|
D
|
h
|
V
|
 |
Back
to Chapter III
References
|